Peer Review Process

Literary Horizons: An International Journal upholds a stringent, honest, open, and academically responsible peer review process. The peer review process is aimed at assessing the academic merit of submitted manuscripts while providing authors with constructive academic feedback to improve the quality of their research.

Editorial & Review Workflow

  1. Manuscript Submission
  2. Initial Editorial Screening
  3. Scope and Quality Assessment
  4. Peer Review
  5. Reviewer Recommendations
  6. Editorial Decision
  7. Revision (if required)
  8. Final Evaluation
  9. Acceptance and Publication

Initial Editorial Screening

Upon submission, every manuscript is evaluated by the Editorial Board to determine whether it:

  • Complies with the aims and scope of the journal.
  • Contains an original academic contribution.
  • Meets the minimum academic and formatting standards.
  • Demonstrates adequate research quality.
  • Conforms to applicable publication ethics.
Manuscripts that do not satisfy the minimum editorial requirements may be returned to the authors before external peer review.

Peer Review Process

Manuscripts considered suitable are reviewed by independent experts with relevant academic qualifications and subject expertise.

The journal follows a Double-Anonymous Peer Review system in which the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process.

Editorial Decisions

  • Accept
  • Minor Revision
  • Major Revision & Resubmission
  • Reject

Author Responsibility

When revisions are requested, authors should respond to every reviewer comment carefully and provide a clear explanation of all modifications made in the revised manuscript.

Review Criteria

Evaluation Area What Reviewers May Consider
Originality Contribution to existing literary scholarship.
Research Question Clarity and relevance of the research problem.
Literature Review Engagement with relevant scholarship.
Theoretical Framework Appropriateness and application of theory.
Methodology Suitability and clarity of the research approach.
Analysis Depth and quality of textual interpretation.
Argument Logical structure and scholarly coherence.
Contribution Significance to the field.
References Accuracy and relevance of cited sources.
Ethics Compliance with applicable research standards.

Commitment to Quality

The peer review process at Literary Horizons ensures the highest standards of academic integrity, scholarly quality, and research excellence. By providing constructive feedback and maintaining a rigorous evaluation process, the journal supports authors in improving their research while contributing valuable knowledge to the field of literary studies.